2026 Software Questions Thread
Doublethink
Admin, 8th Day Host
Last year’s thread can be found here here. In addition, here is the link to the old Forum Functionality thread.
Comments
If you want to get up to speed, last year’s thread is linked above, and the old Forum Functionality thread is also a good reference. Both give helpful context and background for anyone catching up or wanting to revisit earlier discussions.
(ETA broke spam link to casino, DT, Admin)
Oh do fuck off spambot.
Doublethink, Admin
If someone 'has left this conversation', meaning they've deleted a certain conversation thread from their account, but you want to answer them on the same thread (which you still have), will they get your new message, or will it disappear into the unknown and never arrive with them?
Thanks for your insight.
Just wondered if there was something going on?
Yes. There’s an element of “in and out”.
@pease
Seems it’s not just me. Can you investigate please?
Amen!
FYI what is happening to me specifically is that the selection of a forum or thread shows a pause - the iPhonecresponse line doesn’t move for several aeconds then it does. Also when seeking to post a post there is often a delay before the site responds.
That seems very consistent with a potential hacker scraping the site.
Good luck, pease
9.08am British Summer Time and service is absolutely normal.
I suppose “intermittent problem” is to be expected until they feel they’ve scraped enough?
I think this has cropped up elsewhere (the Trump Hell thread?) but it's been happening to me as well so I assume it's happening to everyone.
Could the absence of notifications be connected to the identity of the poster rather than the thread? On FB one doesn’t get notifications for some friends posting when one should expect so.
I'd been assuming that was the case. If we can find the thread that was split off we might get a bound on when the notifications will restart.
Technically, the name of the magazine site is shipoffools.com rather than www.shipoffools.com (although this isn't implemented rigorously). It appears that by default, Firefox will automatically remove the www if it isn't in the certificate. However, the message you posted suggests that Bitdefender's default behaviour is stricter (which wouldn't be unexpected).
Depending, for example, on how disruptive this is to browsing the website, it may be possible to configure this aspect of Bitdefender's behaviour on a per site basis, if you want to go down that route.